Nvidia's Quadro K4000 and AMD's FirePro W7000 simply offer the most bang for the buck. Recommended Workhorses: Nvidia's Quadro K4000 and AMD's FirePro W7000 In titles that haven't received much attention yet, performance is less compelling. Again, this is as long as AMD's driver is optimized for the workload in question. There's a real alternative to Nvidia’s Quadro cards, particularly when you take price into account. The GCN-based cards naturally do well in compute-heavy applications via OpenCL support. Of course, there is still room for improvement. The company is also in a better place with its drivers for many applications. And if a workload overwhelms one of these boards, it's a driver issue, not a limitation of the hardware. AMD caught up in many areas where it previously trailed Nvidia in the professional space. They offer vastly better performance than their predecessors. : Nvidia's Quadro K4000 And AMD's FirePro W7000 Get RecommendationsĪMD: Performance Vastly Improved, Efficiency Steady or Slightly ImprovedĪMD deserves respect for its GCN-based FirePro cards.: OpenCL: Simulation And Function Results.: OpenCL: Encryption And Decryption Results.: OpenCL: Double-Precision Financial Analysis Results.: OpenCL: Single-Precision Financial Analysis Results.: Single- And Double-Precision Results.: CUDA: iray Renderer + 3ds Max Results.: OpenGL Synthetic: TessMark (OpenGL 4.0).: OpenGL Synthetic: GPU Caps Viewer PostFX.: OpenGL Synthetic: Unigine Heaven, Sanctuary, And Tropics.: SPECviewperf 11: TCVIS And SNX Results.: SPECviewperf 11: Pro/ENGINEER And SolidWorks Results.: SPECviewperf 11: LightWave And Maya Results.: SPECviewperf 11: CATIA And EnSight Results.: Benchmark System, Drivers, And Software.: 21 Graphics Cards, Benchmarked And Compared In Workstation Apps.Nvidia's Quadro K4000 And AMD's FirePro W7000 Get Recommendations
0 kommentar(er)
